A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours about the development of the wall in a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has captivated national focus subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household house at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier along with the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a highly publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design operates at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, request to construct their loved ones property. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of established residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up authorization by creating a wall outside of the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on the Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result regions are subject to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly built, is in the right situation. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable initiatives via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waist-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, an image which has given that turn into emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they ended up meant to gather visual proof with the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Periods reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water in the course of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become The most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely noted that such actions ended up cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined intimately because of the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the legal timeline.
On the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain that the wall, as made, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling files, maps, and ailments connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is inspired by worry for environmental security and adherence to planning regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got described their very long-standing link to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair just seeking to produce a spouse and children property in accordance Together with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Space of Conservation and say that all will work happen to be completed according to Qualified suggestions and accredited plans. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not alter the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web page has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and planning ailments. Nevertheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns such as Rene Collier environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.